Input example
approved-script.txt + voiceover.wav before exporting VTT
Subtitle file format
VTT subtitle files for web video and SRT vs VTT decisions
VTT is common in web players and review workflows. TimedSubs keeps VTT tied to the same script-first timing and quality contract as SRT.
Output asset example
a checked VTT subtitle file with quality status preserved
Common quality signal
A subtitle line overlaps or reads too fast, so export should pause until it is fixed.
Decision points
Best use
Use VTT when a web player, review page, or HTML5 video workflow expects WebVTT rather than SRT.
SRT vs VTT decision
VTT is the better fit for web video and review surfaces that support WebVTT. SRT is usually safer when you need the most portable file for platforms, editors, and client handoff.
TimedSubs angle
Generate VTT from the same aligned subtitle timeline, so SRT and VTT exports stay consistent.
Delivery risk
Keep line length, reading speed, overlap, and ordering checks visible before sending VTT to a client or web team.
Practical workflow
- 1
Create a Script + Audio project.
- 2
Inspect subtitle line timing and quality notes.
- 3
Export VTT for web or review surfaces.
Product boundary
TimedSubs prepares the subtitle asset. Your web player, CMS, or video host remains the publishing surface.
FAQ
Is VTT better than SRT?
It depends on the destination. SRT is widely portable; VTT is often better for web players.
Can I export both?
Yes, when your plan and quality status allow both formats.
SRT vs VTT: which should I export?
Use VTT for web players and review pages that expect WebVTT. Use SRT for broad creator-platform, editor, and client delivery.